G20 Essay free essay sample

All citizens of Canada have freedom and are entitled to rights. Canadian citizens can fight for their rights as long as they do it peacefully because violence is not necessary in a protest. Protests are held to express your concern. Canada has one of the greatest law enforcements. The police in our Country/city try to maintain the peace giving 100% to keep our country/city safe and peaceful. These police officers have the rights to protect citizens by any means necessary. If the protests get out of hand there are police officers to maintain the peace. Secondly, there are police officers to prevent people from vandalizing. Finally, there are police officers to protect people even if they are abused. Police officers have the rights to protect citizens by any means necessary because they care about our safety. â€Å"More than 400 people were arrested as violence broke out after thousands of anti-G20 protesters marched through downtown Toronto on Saturday prompting police to use tear gas in the city for the first time ever. We will write a custom essay sample on G20 Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page †[Pg. 1] Police officers care about the people’s safety because they are trained to serve and protect the country. Without police officers the country will be overcome with crime and chaos. Police officers are the reason why there is peace and freedom in our country. The G20 protesters caused a riot and nearly destroyed downtown, Toronto. More than 400 people were arrested which showed there were a lot of illegal activities going on. The officers made many arrests so that the people causing chaos don’t affect the peaceful protesters. Many illegal activities prompted the police officers to use tear gas in the city for the first time ever. Tear gas was used to settle the protesters down so it was safer. â€Å"There were some, tense moments, â€Å"said CBC reporter Steven D’souza. More than a dozen police on horseback were also on the scene†. [Pg. 4] Many illegal activities were going on and police officers were all over the place for people’s safety. More than a dozen were on horse backs, to show people they are there for their safety. â€Å"On the eve of the big summit, G20 protesters are complaining bitterly about all the security- the helicopters, the water cannons, the ugly fence, and the countless cops. What they fail to acknowledge is that most of it would be wholly unnecessary if they simply agreed to renounce violence, something they consistently refuse to do. † [Pg. 7] G20 protesters do not realize why so many law enforcements were used. If there were no illegal activities and chaos occurring they would have not used this much force. Without police officers the G20 would have been a total mess with cars being torched and buildings damaged. The police officers were there for the citizen’s safety and many law enforcements were used to keep the public safe. Vandalism is unnecessary in any sort of protest. The G20 had many people vandalizing public properties, such as stores restaurants and cars. The police officer protected the citizens by any means necessary. â€Å"Four police vehicles were set ablaze, stores and bank windows were smashed and much of the area was put under security lock down. The integrated security unit said 412 people were arrested. † [Pg. 1] Vandalism is unnecessary in a protest because vandalism only causes more problems to solve. The G20 is like any other protest, a group of people expressing their concern out with boards and signs. The G20 had many officers, to protect everybody, but there were also many people that were vandalizing cars, stores, and banks. Vandalism encourages and increases the amount of law enforcements because the police officers cannot control the protesters without more backup. â€Å"Earlier, the black-clad protesters smashed up a police cruiser and smashed its windshield along Queen Street, as other demonstrator’s huried bottles and sticks at a solid line of riot police†. [Pg. 9] The protesting group â€Å"Black-Clad† smashed a police cruiser and vandalized the car. There were also other groups that vandalized. There were also many peaceful protesters that did not vandalize and were there to express their cause. Vandalism was unnecessary for the G20 protesters because it causes conflicts. â€Å"As police donned gas masks and mounted units rode into the city’s core on horses, the violent protesters let garbage on fire and flipped over recycling containers. They also smashed vehicles in and grabbed stones from nearby homes†. [Pg. 9] G20 protesters found ways to exceed the given boundaries to get what they want by causing chaos. If police cruisers were not enough, the protesters moved to garbage cans and recycling bins to set on fire. The protesters are only vandalizing there city of Toronto, where they live. Many of the G20 protesters abused the police officers, but the police officers did their job and protected the citizens. â€Å"Moments later, another standoff occurred a few blocks west, where protesters reportedly tossed sticks at police and chanted â€Å"let us go. † [Pg. 9] The police officers did their job effectively, which was to protect the citizens by any means necessary. But the protesters never did what they were supposed to. This was to peacefully protest without causing chaos. The officer’s were abused as sticks and rocks were thrown at them. But the police officers did their job by protecting all the citizens even after they were abused. â€Å"Heavily armed riot police are attempting to clear crowds out of downtown Tor onto, several hours after â€Å"Black-Clad† vandals through the city in protest of the G20 summit. †[Pg. 8] The â€Å"Black-Clad† protesting group caused chaos. The riot police officers wanted to clear out the area so there would be less chaos. The crowd was not cooperating with the riot police when they tried to clear out the G20 summit protesters. â€Å"Police repeatedly moved toward groups of demonstrators to move them back. At one point, many protesters were arrested. †[Pg. 1] Police officers tried moving the group’s back to keep the place clear and fewer riots. At one point the protesters were arrested because they abused the police officers and did not cooperate with the police officers request. Police officers have the rights to protect citizens by any means necessary because of citizen’s safety, vandalism and abusing police. Citizen’s safety is important to officers because there duty is to keep all citizens safe and not cause a riot. Officers made arrest for the people that caused vandalism because breaking public property and torching vehicles only cause a riot. When a riot is caused there’s going to be more forces involved and the officers need to protect private properties and innocent citizens. Protesters abusing police officers is not going to stop them from protecting them because police officers will protect citizens good or bad no matter how much they get abused.

Assignment HR 2015 Essays - Laws Of War, Free Essays, Term Papers

Assignment HR 2015 Essays - Laws Of War, Free Essays, Term Papers There is a lot of misunderstanding about the principle of proportionality. It has to do with minimizing civilian casualties and damage to civilian property; it has nothing to do with equality of arms, nor with comparing the number of casualties on each side. 2 In other words, known broadly, as the principle that when attacking military objectives belligerents must make sure that any collateral damage to civilians is not out of proportion to the military. The principle of proportionality has also been found by the ICRC to form part of customary international law in international and non-international armed conflicts. It is clear that the Yugoslav Tribunal is of the opinion that (a) a rule of proportionality exists in customary international law and (b) that its formulation is in accordance with that proposed in Protocol I. Hensel, Howard M., ed. Legitimate Use of Military Force. Abingdon, Oxon, GBR: Ashgate Publishing Group, 2008. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 23 November 2015. Copyright 2008. Ashgate Publishing Group. All rights reserved. The principle of proportionality, as in Rule 14 of the ICRC Rules, is expressed as a rule of prohibition. Hensel, Howard M., ed. Legitimate Use of Military Force. Abingdon, Oxon, GBR: Ashgate Publishing Group, 2008. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 22 November 2015. Copyright 2008. Ashgate Publishing Group. All rights reserved. Nowadays, customary international law recognizes the principle of proportionality. 47 In the words of Judge Higgins, in her Dissenting Opinion in the NuclearWeapons Advisory Opinion: The principle of proportionality, even if finding no specific mention, is reflected in many provisions of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. Thus even a legitimate target may not be attacked if the collateral civilian casualties would be disproportionate to the specific military gain from the attack. 48 It must be appreciated that a military objective does not cease being a military objective on account of the disproportionate collateral civilian casualties. The principle of proportionality provides a further restriction by disallowing attacks against impeccable military objectives owing to anticipated disproportionate injury and damage to civilians or civilian objects. 49 Dinstein, Yoram. Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 22 November 2015. Copyright 2004. Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved. Hensel, Howard M., ed. Legitimate Use of Military Force. Abingdon, Oxon, GBR: Ashgate Publishing Group, 2008. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 22 November 2015. . Military manuals which are applicable in or have been applied in noninternational armed conflicts specify the principle of proportionality in attack.19 Many States have adopted legislation making it an offence to violate the principle of proportionality in attack in any armed conflict. 20 In theMilitary Junta case in 1985, the National Appeals Court of Argentina considered the principle of proportionality in attack to be part of customary international law. 21 There are also a number of official statements pertaining to armed conflicts in general or to non-international armed conflicts in particular that refer to this rule. 22 The pleadings of States before the International Court of Justice in the Nuclear Weapons case referred to above were couched in general terms applicable in all armed conflicts. The jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and a report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights provide further evidence of the customary nature of this rule in non international armed conflicts. 23 No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. Alleged violations of the principle of proportionality in attack have generally been condemned by States. 24 The United Nations and other international organisations have also condemned such violations, for example, in the context of the conflicts in Chechnya, Kosovo, the Middle East and the former Yugoslavia. 25 The ICRC has reminded parties to both international and non-international Armed conflicts of their duty to respect the principle of proportionality in attack. 26 have shown, the obligation to distinguish whether a target is civilian in nature continues to be upheld in instances where combatants are located within the civilian population. These examples demonstrate that the principle of distinction is a necessary component of IHL, as the principle acts as a mechanism for holding violators to account during judicial proceedings. However, as the final section of this paper will argue, in order for this principle to be effective, greater enforcement efforts must be made

The rights-based approach and carbon taxes in Australia Assignment

The rights-based approach and carbon taxes in Australia - Assignment Example The concept finds its roots in the United Nations, and is predicated on the theory that â€Å"human rights determine the relationship between individuals and groups with valid claims (rightsholders) and State and non-state actors with correlative obligations (duty-bearers).† (UNICEF, 2004: 92). Its adoption by the United Nations as the framework by which its pursues its interventions is significant, in that it heralds a shift from a needs-based approach, i.e., looking at what people need, to looking at what people have an absolute inalienable right to, by virtue of being human. (Alston, 2003: 7). A rights-based approach imposes a duty on the State to uphold this right as a function of the social contract, whereas a â€Å"need-based† approach may not necessarily so. Central therefore to the RBA is the re-emergence of the state and governance as a central element in development (Baxi, 2005: 2), through a focus on the interrelation between the state and its citizens in ter ms of duties and rights. (Boesen and Martin, 2007: 9). We now proceed to looking at the carbon tax issue, a controversial issue that has been the subject of much controversy and debate in Australia. The carbon tax is basically a levy that the government intends to impose on corporations that release carbon into the atmosphere. According to Nielson (2010: 7), â€Å"in theory, environmentally related taxes should be set at a level equal to the external environmental cost of a particular product or activity.† Essentially, this means that the cost to the environment is computed into the cost of manufacturing a commodity so as to create disincentives for â€Å"dirty companies† using environmentally-unsustainable technologies.... The RBA presupposes a social contract between the rights claim-holders and the state that has a duty to uphold these rights. Amartya Sen (1999) is a key thinker in this philosophy of â€Å"entitlements† – human beings have inalienable rights to demand from the state all that he or she needs to be enhance his or her capabilities. In a sense, the RBA places a special bias on the poor and the marginalized, upon the recognition that it is them whose rights are the most vulnerable. To quote, â€Å"The underlying structural, social and political drivers of poverty, vulnerability and inequality have to be addressed in the context of a broad development strategy, in which social protection plays an important part. (van Ginneken, 2011: 3). What does this have to do with carbon taxes? The obligation of the state in this case is the obligation to maintain and promote a clean and healthy environment for its constituents. Study after study have demonstrated that climate change will affect the poor and the ordinary wage-earners the most (see for example, McGuigan, et. al., 2002) and hence, the state has a duty to protect them and ensure the sustainability of the environment and the availability of natural resources for generations to come. The rate of pollution being emitted in the atmosphere has debilitating effects on water sanitation, agriculture, etc. When resources are scarce, the prices of the resources or the commodities made from these resources jack up – and these fluctuations in prices affect the most vulnerable in society. Hence, there is no denying that ordinary people are compromised the most by climate change – ordinary people who have inalienable rights to live healthily and raise their

Miranda Warnings Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Miranda Warnings - Essay Example (Means 2007:73) If this warning would have been read at the scene, you would have realized that the boy could not speak English. You still could have taken the boy into custody, but refrain from asking questions. If you recognized the language, a radio transmission to downtown would have allowed for a translator to be on hand upon your arrival. This suspect must voluntarily waive their Miranda rights before questioning can proceed and understand them (Miranda v. Arizona). The ability to voluntarily waive Miranda rights orally and in writing must be done with understanding. If a person does not understand their right to an attorney without charge, that violates their Miranda rights. Even if they are not confessing or talking, the person needs to understand their right to an attorney due to the third Miranda right. Thus before this suspect, which you state was arrested, can be booked they must be read their rights. If the boy is underage, which was not established due to the language, a good faith effort to find a parent or guardian must take place. When the family member arrives at the police station, an effort to find the parent or guardian must be completed. The family relative can provide the age of the defendant. Even if the boy is underage, the Miranda rights must be given and understood. Ferdico, Fradella, and Totten (2008:724) reports that a suspect must understand and waive their rights. The guardian/relative and boy must understand that a lawyer will be provided for free. The third Miranda right give suspects the right to a lawyer even if poor. The reason a parent/guardian of a suspect needs to know this right is to protect the suspect. If a parent/guardian thinks that they will have to pay for an attorney, they might counsel the boy to talk to avoid paying for counsel. That could be ammunition for a good defense attorney. The boy must understand that an attorney will not burden his family. That is his third

Market structure Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Market structure - Research Paper Example This implies that product differentiation exists and each one is capable of satisfying divergent consumer needs. Barriers to entry are few thus explaining why the competitors are many in number (Makiw, 2008). The oligopolistic market structure is one in which a small number of players operate, and they can control the market. Usually, these players are large enough and account for a substantial market share. They make decisions interdependently and are highly motivated by the need to cooperate. Therefore, players exert a degree of control over market conditions. Furthermore, this model is characterized by many barriers to entry. A monopoly is a market in which only a single producer exists. The person is therefore capable of exercising considerable control over the market. Products sold do not have close substitutes thus prompting consumers to stick to them. Normally, the monopoly thrives in water distribution, electricity and gas industries. Barriers to entry are also quite high. 2. Real life example of a market structure in my local city A Shell retail outlet is an example of an oligopolistic market in my city. The organization has relatively few competitors in the gas pump market. Retail outlets may be high in number but the number of companies controlling those outlets is relatively few. Furthermore, Shell is a large company that accounts for about 20% of the market share. This degree of concentration in the oil retail industry makes Shell gullible to collusions with its rivals. For a number of times, the company has been accused of setting artificial prices that do not relate to world oil prices. Regardless, the organization’s products are often sold for a price that is relatively close to market rates. In oligopolistic markets, this is typical for many organizations as competition based on price could lead to inefficiencies. Barriers to trade are also substantial as certain restrictions exist. Shell has control over oil as a natural resource. It is also a vertically integrated firm in which other aspects of oil production take place. The facilities and equipment needed to carry out this work are quite expensive. Therefore, new entrants would not have the economies of scale needed to make significant profits in the market. They would have to raise their prices in order to cover production costs, yet this would drive away consumers who would seek inespensice alternatives. Shell also enjoys large revenue streams from its elaborate business model. Therefore, it is likely that a competitor interested in entering the market would have difficulties advertising or matching Shell’s marketing expenditure (Frank and Bernanke, 2009). 3. How high entry barriers into markets influence long run profitability Entry barriers may come in the form of patents, government licensing, benefits that accrue from economies of scale or resource control. Industries with high entry barriers will not have many alternative suppliers. Therefore, mark et forces will be weakened. Profitability will mostly depend on the supply side of the equation. Usually, when a seller sets their prices, they normally do this on the basis of their costs. Marginal costs refer to those additional expenditures incurred when a seller makes an additional item. In markets with low entry barriers, sellers will price their commodities on the basis of

Imagery Of Madame Bovary

Imagery Of Madame Bovary In many forms of literature, authors use symbols as a representation of interpretive meaning. In Gustave Flauberts novel, Madame Bovary (1856), one of the major achievements is the excellent use of symbolism. Many of the moral values throughout the novel lie within the use of symbols, which are the elements in the narrative that communicate the rich values over and above their literal meanings (Dauner 1). The apparent purpose of the author is to paint pictures with words, bringing scenes and settings alive with the astonishing use of descriptions. Flauberts descriptions are often built up like pictures, from left to right of background to foreground, occasionally even moving through the senses, from sound and smell to touch and sight (Levi 235). Through the use of symbolism, this novel appeals to the senses of idealists. Flaubert uses the garden as a symbol throughout his work that affects the main character, Emma, and implies certain connotations other than its literal meaning. In P art I of the novel, this symbol is presented repeatedly with rich association. Throughout Part I, the Tostes section of Emmas life, the garden appears four different times. It first appears after Emma marries Charles and has seats made around the sundial in the garden. This not only represents her initiative, but also her early stages of romanticism. Later, after she has realized the difference between her vision of Romance from the novels in which she has read, and the marriage to a man that is satisfied with his middle-class lifestyle and has no desire to ascend into higher social class, she begins to go to the garden by moonlight and tries to make herself fall in love with Charles, while singing passionate poems and singing melancholy. The garden now functions as a character symbol, representing Emmas ambition and her bourgeois romanticism. The garden also plays a major role at Vaubyessard. During the ball, Emma looks out the window which opens to the garden, where she then sees peasants peering in from the garden, their faces pressed against the glass (Flaubert 1067). From the garden, her memory of the past seems to be as remote to her present as her actual present is remote for this single night of wealth and society. According to Clive James, this is the scene that awakes Emmas dangerous taste for the high life (3). For this night, Flaubert explains to the reader, [à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦] had opened a breach in her life, like one of those great crevasses that a storm can tear across the face of a mountain in the course of a single night (1070). Now, the garden creates a type reference in time and character, embracing past, present, and future. Emma is not as she was nor how she will be. The final appearance in Tostes is represented as a pure mood mirror (Dauner 2). There was no sounds of birds, everything seemed to be sleeping- the espaliered trees under their straw, the vi ne like a great sick snake under the wall coping, where she could see many legged wood lice crawling as she came near (Flaubert 1074). Here, the garden is used as an objective to Emmas self-pitying of her marriage. Later in the novel, the garden also plays an important role in the fulfillment of Emmas destiny. Later, the garden appears at least seven times in the fulfillment of Emmas destiny. Because of Emmas taste for a higher lifestyle, she develops bad health that persuades Charles to move from Tostes to Yonville, where she meets Leon, the young clerk at the notarys. They soon become attracted to each other through their romantic interests. One day, Leon accompanies Emma on a walk to see her infant, who is with the wet nurse. On their way back to Yonville, Emma becomes tired and takes Leons arm. Next, they pass by The garden walls, their copings bristling with broken bits of bottles, were as warm as the glass of a greenhouse. Wallflowers had taken root between the bricks; and as she passed, the edge of Madame Bovarys open parasol crumbled some of their faded flowers into yellow dust; or an overhanging branch of honeysuckle or clematis would catch in the fringe and cling for a moment to the silk (Flaubert 1093). The two then spoke for a brief moment, but Their eyes were full of more mean ingful talk; and as they made themselves utter banalties they sensed the same languor invading them both (Flaubert 1093). Through the objective details of the author and with Emmas apparent purposeful violation of the wallflowers with her sunshade, Flaubert may have been employing an underlying sexual tone that relates to both the concept of the garden and the tension of the walk, which may also be foreshadowing Emmas affair with Leon. Emma herself is a kind of wallflower-emotionally untouched (James 5). Soon after Leon leaves for Rouen, Emmas thought revives her happiness of the [à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦] afternoons by themselves in the garden! He had read aloud to her, bareheaded on a rustic bench, the cool wind from the meadows ruffling the pages of his book and the nasturtiums on the arborà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦. And now he was gone, the one bright spot in her life, her one possible hope of happiness! (Flaubert 1110). The garden now acts as the physical force that creates Emmas emotion. Later, w hen Leon comes back from Rouen to visit her, it is behind the garden that she meets him, as she had previously done with Rudolphe. The garden continues to play an important part of Emmas life up until the point of her death. Emma soon becomes disgusted with the garden because of the memory in which it evokes. She then develops a type of sickness for the garden and keeps her blinds in the house down on that particular side so that she will not have to see it. At this point, the garden functions simply as a symbol of memory and mood. Finally, after Emmas death, it is in the garden that the reader finds Charles, [à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦] with his head leaning back against the wall, his eyes closed, his mouth open; and there was a long lock of black hair in his hands (Flaubert 1249). The author uses the garden in this instance as a symbol of tragic irony. According to James Panero, Symbolism has always been stronger in its literary rather than graphic forms (3). Through examining the work of Flaubert, and his superb use of symbols and vivid descriptions, one could conclude this assumption to be true. Flaubert revolutionized fiction with his use of point of view to provide multiple images to provoke symbolic meanings (Smothers 3). Flaubert uses the garden as a poetic symbol in a variety of ways throughout his novel. It moves from the lighter tone of a character to assuming darker qualities that foreshadow Emmas increasing involvements. The garden also carries a sexual connotation and often becomes a thematic symbol. It would not be a far stretch to say that the garden in this novel has become a conventional symbol, meaning that people have to come to accept it as standing for something other than its literal meaning (Barnet 212).

Crime Of Passion By Barbara Hu :: Barbara Hu Crime Of Passion

The essay â€Å"A Crime of Compassion† was written by Barbara Huttmann. A story of love, dedication, moral values, and a nurse who loved her job and her patients very dearly. One of her patients was a young police officer who had been diagnosed with lung cancer. Within six months time, he had lost his youth, two of his five senses and his ability to do anything for himself. He had stopped breathing numerous times, and each time he was resuscitated. Eventually the pain became unbearable and he begged for God to take him. Being resuscitated wasn’t what he wanted anymore, he wanted to die. This nurse with so much love and so much knowledge relieved him of his pain and let him die. The public and the hospital then scolded her. She was labeled a murderer. The author’s use of description was very detailed and very real. Reading this essay was like watching it on television. Every sentence was described with so much depth; there was no need to imagine the scenery or the excitement of the hospital. The healthy police officer was described as a young, witty macho cop with thirty-two pounds of attack equipment. When reading this, the vision of a man in a blue uniform with his gun and walkie-talkie enters the mind. When the man had been diagnosed with lung cancer he was described as a sixty pound skeleton being kept alive by liquid food poured down a tube. The code blues were described horrifically. He stopped breathing two to three times a day, and every time he stopped he was resuscitated. â€Å"The nurses stayed to wipe away the saliva that drooled from his mouth, irrigate the big craters of bedsores that covered his hips, suction the lung fluids that threatened to drown him, clean the feces that burned his skin†¦Ã¢â‚¬  He was going through an agonizing ordeal, and he was being kept alive unnaturally. The pain he was enduring was far too much for any human or any animal to sustain.